Management of Large Scale Thesis Production
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53555/nncse.v5i1.389Keywords:
Management of Large, Scale Thesis ProductionAbstract
This study focuses on investigating several parameters that may influence the production of student theses in a University setting. This knowledge is valuable in determining future changes in any of the parameters that may influence the production and quality of the graduation work at the department. During the period of the study, there have been several changes in the process of thesis writing at the department, trigged by internal and external factors. The analysis has been done in steps where new variables have been calculated from other variables, for instance, the number of days from start to finish. There is no exact way of measuring this period so in the study the start date is considered to be the date of the students registering for the thesis course, the completion date is set to be the date of the last grade of the project. On the aggregated level three variables have been studied to determine the change over time, completion rates, change in grades and the time it takes for a student from registration to completion. During the studied period, projects started from 2010 and through to 2014; there is noticeable a sharp increase of noncompeting between 2011 and 2012. One reason for this could be the introduction of new grading criteria, but the increases are not dropping off but continue to rise. Projects started in 2010 have a non-completion rate of about 17 percent, for projects started in 2014 has this increased to about 42 percent. The time from the start to completion has increased during the studied period, from an average of 175 days in 2010 to 331 in 2014. There is a sharp increase in the length to completion in 2012, possibly caused by the introduction of a new grading process. A total of 47 supervisors fulfilled the requirements of the study by starting at least ten projects in the period of this analysis. Twenty-eight of the supervisors have at least 50 percent completion rate, this group of supervisors also have a shorter time to completion, on an average 319 days as compared with the group that has lower completion rate the average time to completion is 399 days. Recommendations from this study are in three separate strategies: recommendations on a viable process for improvement of the production process, recommendations on immediate changes in management directives regarding supervision and finally recommendations towards a new management style in general.
References
Armstrong, S. J. (2004) The impact of supervisors' cognitive styles on the quality of research supervision in management education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(4), pp. 599-616.
Cook, B. G. and Odom, S. L. (2013) Evidence-based practices and implementation science in special education. Exceptional children, 79(2), pp. 135-144.
De Kleijn, R. A., Mainhard, M. T., Meijer, P. C., Pilot, A. and Brekelmans, M. (2012) Master's thesis supervision: Relations between perceptions of the supervisor–student relationship, final grade, perceived supervisor contribution to learning and student satisfaction. Studies in Higher Education, 37(8), pp. 925-939.
Dewey, J. and Boydston, J. A. (1984) The later works of John Dewey, Southern Illinois University Press. Frow, J. (1988) Discipline and discipleship. Textual Practice, 2(3), pp. 307-323.
Gallacher, K. (1997) Supervision, mentoring and coaching. Reforming personnel in early intervention, pp. 191-214. Giblett, R. (1992) The desire for disciples. Paragraph, 15(2), pp. 136-155. Guskey, T. R. (1986) Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational researcher, 15(5), pp. 5-12.
Hansson, H., Larsson, K. and Wettergren, G. (2009) Open and flexible ICT-support for student thesis production-design concept for the future. In Mills, A. G. a. R., (ed.) The Cambridge International Conference on Open and Distance Learning 2009, Cambridge, UK: The Open University. pp. 197- 204.
Kalman, Y. M. and Leng, P. H. (2007) A distributed model for managing academic staff in an international online academic programme. Interactive Learning Environments, 15(1), pp. 47-60.
Kolb, A. Y. and Kolb, D. A. (2005) Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of management learning & education, 4(2), pp. 193-212.
Kolb, D. (1984) Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Kreysing, M. (2002) Autonomy, accountability, and organizational complexity in higher education: the Goettingen model of university reform. Journal of Educational Administration, 40(6), pp. 552- 560.
Lee, A. and Green, B. (2009) Supervision as metaphor. Studies in Higher Education, 34(6), pp. 615-630. Lusted, D. (1986) Why pedagogy? Screen, 27(5), pp. 2-16. Manathunga, C. (2007) Supervision as mentoring: The role of power and boundary crossing. Studies in Continuing education, 29(2), pp. 207-221.
Odom, S. L., Brantlinger, E., Gersten, R., Horner, R. H., Thompson, B. and Harris, K. R. (2005) Research in special education: Scientific methods and evidence-based practices. Exceptional children, 71(2), pp. 137-148.
Orton, J. D. and Weick, K. E. (1990) Loosely coupled systems: A econceptualization. Academy of management review, 15(2), pp. 203-223. Pearson, M. and Brew, A. (2002) Research training and supervision development. Studies in Higher Education, 27(2), pp. 135-150.
Price, D. C. and Money, A. H. (2002) Alternative models for doctoral mentor organisation and research supervision. Mentoring and Tutoring, 10(2), pp. 127-135.
Taylor, S. and Beasley, N. (2005) A handbook for doctoral supervisors, Psychology Press. Todd, M. J., Smith, K. and Bannister, P. (2006) Supervising a social science undergraduate dissertation: staff experiences and perceptions. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(2), pp. 161-173.
Weick, K. E. (1976) Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative science quarterly, pp. 1-19.
Wisker, G., Robinson, G., Trafford, V., Warnes, M. and Creighton, E. (2003) From supervisory dialogues to successful PhDs: Strategies supporting and enabling the learning conversations of staff and students at postgraduate level. Teaching in Higher Education, 8(3), pp. 383-397.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Terms & Condition
Submission -
Author can submit the manuscript through our online submission process or email us at the designated email id in contact details.
The other mode of submission not accepted than online and email.
Before submission please read the submission guidelines.
NN Publication accepts only article submitted in pdf/doc/docx/rtf file format. Another format except given file formats will no be considered .
Author will be responsible for the error mistakes in the submission files. The minor changes can be done without any cost after publication. But for major changes NN Publication may charges you the editing charges.
Publication (Online) -
The online publication is scheduled on last date of every month, but it can be delayed by 24 to 48 hours due to editorial process if huge number of articles comes to publish in single issue.
Automatic notificatation email will be sent to the all users on publication of an issue, so its author’s duty to check their email inbox or SPAM folder to get this notification.
After publication of article author can not withdraw their article.
If editor’s found any issue after publication of article then the NN Publication have the authority to remove the article from online website.
No refund will be provided after online publication of article.
Publication (Print) -
The print copy publication are sent as per the author’s request after 2 weeks of online publication of that issue.
NN Publication will ship the article by India Post and provide the consignment number on dispatch of print copy.
NN Publication follows all the guidelines of delivery provided by IndiaPost and hence not responsible for delay in delivery due to any kind of reasons.
Refund of hard copy will not be provided after dispatch or print of the journal.
NN Publication will be responsible for raise a complain if there is any issue occurs in delivery, but still will not be responsible for providing the refund.
NN Publication will be responsible to resend the print copy only and only if the print copy is lost or print copy is damaged in delivery / or there is delay more than 6 months.
According to India Post the delivery should be completed with in 1-3 weeks after dispatch of articles.
Privacy Policy-
NN Publicationl uses the email ids of authors and editors and readers for sending editorial or publication notification only, we do not reveal or sell the email ids to any other website or company.
