Effects of Traditional and Alternative Routes of Teacher Certification on Student Achievement

Authors

  • Jenita Carroll Hegwood Southern University at New Orleans

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53555/nnel.v4i8.578

Keywords:

pedagogy,, certification, teacher quality

Abstract

The demand for accountability over the past decades has altered the landscape of educational success determinants.  However, even before the beginning of the advocacy for accountability, various studies were focused on ways of improving test scores.  The implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act has forced schools and institutions to look at programs to ensure the success and accountability of students at the elementary and high school level.  Supporters of the No Child Left Behind Act believe the emphasis on test results will improve the academic success for all students (White, n.d.).  Students are now tested every year to determine their progress from year to year.  This helps parents, school leaders, and teachers measure teacher growth and student learning.  This new assessment system in schools has resulted in teachers having to pay more attention to the requirements of a test and student achievement.  States are now forced to produce effective and highly qualified teachers.  One of the most critical factors affecting student achievement is the teacher.  An effective teacher helps students outperform those students who are not served by an effective teacher (No Child Left Behind Toolkit for Teachers, 2004). 

Author Biography

  • Jenita Carroll Hegwood, Southern University at New Orleans

    Assistant Professor of Teacher Education

References

Au, W. (2004, Fall). No Child Left Untested: The NCLB Zone. Retrieved June 19, 2008, from Rethinking Schools Online: http://www.rethinkingschools.org/archive/19_01/nclb191.shtml

Boyd, G. L. (2007, Spring). The Effect of Certification and Preparation on Teacher Quality. Retrieved June 19, 2008, from www.futureofchildren.org: http://www.futureofchildren.org/usr_doc/7_03.pdf

Boyd, D., Grossman, P., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2006). How changes in entry requirements alter the teacher workforce and affect student achievement. Education Finance & Policy, 1(2); 176-216.

Bradshaw, L. (1998). Policy, Politics, and Contradictions of Alternative Teacher Certification. San Diego: ERIC.

Darling-Hammond, L., Holtzman, D. J., Gatlin, S. J., & Heilig, J. V. (2005). Does teacher preparation matter? Evidence about Teacher certification, Teach for America, and Teacher Effectiveness. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(42). Retrieved [December 2, 2008] from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v13n42

Darling-Hammond, L. (Ed). (1994). Professional development schools: Schools for developing a profession. New York: Teachers College Press.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2002). Research and Rhetoric on Teacher Certification: A Response to "Teacher Certification Reconsidered. ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation.

Feistritzer, C.E., and D.T. Chester. Alternative Teacher Certification: A State-by-State Analysis. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Information, 2002.

Finn, C.E., Jr. (1999). Foreword. In M. Kanstoroom & C. E. Finn, Jr. (Eds.), Better teachers, better schools (pp. v—vii). Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.

Gatlin, D. Thinking Outside of the University. Retrieved December 2, 2008 from Innovation in Alternative Certification. http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2008/04/pdf/alternative_certification.pdf

Hawley, W. 1990. “The Theory and Practice of Alternative Certification: Implications for the Improvement of Teaching.” Peabody Journal of Education 67(Spring): 3–34.

Hess, F. M. 2001. Tear Down this Wall: The Case for a Radical Overhaul of Teacher Certification. Washington, DC: Progressive Policy Institute.

Humprey, W. & Wechsler, M. & Heather, H. (2005). CHARACTERISTICS OF EFFECTIVE ALTERNATIVE TEACHER CERTIFICATION PROGRAMS. SRI International.

Mayer, Daniel P., Paul T. Decker, Steven Glazerman, Timothy W. Silva. 2003. “Identifying Alternative Certification Program for an Impact Evaluation of Teacher Preparation.” 8940-400. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. (April).
http://www.mathematica-mpr.com/PDFs/identify.pdf

McKibbin, M., & Ray, L. (1994). A Guide for Alternative Certification Program Improvement. The Educational Forum, 58, 201-208.

No Child Left Behind Toolkit for Teachers (2004). Retrieved on August 21, 2018 from http://www2.ed.gov/teachers/nclbguide/nclb-teachers-toolkit.pdf

Stoddart, T., & Floden, R. E. (1995). Traditional and alternate routes to teacher certification: Issues, assumptions, and misconceptions. Issue Paper 25-2, #48824-1034, from the National Center for Research on Teacher Learning, ERIC Document, ED 383697.

Unmuth, K. (2008, June 22). State pushes for stricter rules on alternative certification teacher programs. Retrieved June 23, 2008, from dallasnews.com: http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/latestnews/stories/062208dnmetaltcertbattle.40f41b5.html

White, D. (n.d.) Pros & Cons of the No Child Left Behind Act. Retrieved August 21, 2018 from http://usliberals.about.com/od/education/i/NCLBProsCons.htm

Wilson, S.M., Floden, R.E. & Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2002). Teacher preparation research: An insider's view from the outside. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(3), 190-240. Download the article at http://depts.washington.edu/ctpmail/Reports.html#TeacherPrep.

Wise, A. E., and L. Darling-Hammond (1991). “Alternative Certification Is an Oxymoron.” Education Week September 4.

Zeichner, K. M. and A. K. Schulte (2001). "What we know and don't know from peer-reviewed research about alternative teacher certification programs." Journal of Teacher Education 52(4): 266-282.

Downloads

Published

2018-08-31

How to Cite

Hegwood, J. C. (2018). Effects of Traditional and Alternative Routes of Teacher Certification on Student Achievement. International Journal of Advance Research in Education & Literature (ISSN 2208-2441), 4(8), 01-08. https://doi.org/10.53555/nnel.v4i8.578