STATISTICAL METHOD FOR EMPIRICAL TESTING OF COMPETING THEORY IN ANAMBRA STATE POLYTECHNIC, MGBAKWU..

Authors

  • OKOLI, BONIFACE CHUKWUMA Institution: Anambra State Polytechnic, Mgbakwu. Dapartment: Computer Engineering Technology
  • Enukonwu Patience Amaoge Institution Anambra State Polytechnic, Mgbakwu, Dapartment Computer Engineering Technology,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53555/nncse.v9i5.1696

Keywords:

Empirical testing, Competing theories, statistical method, finite Mixture-Models, probability model.

Abstract

Empirical testing of competing theories lies at the heart of social science and applied Science research. We demonstrate that a well-known class of statistical models, called finite mixture models, provides an effective way of rival theory testing. In the proposed framework, each observation is assumed to be generated either from statistical models implied by one of the competing theories or more generally from a weighted combination of multiple statistical models under consideration. Researchers can then estimate the probability that a specific observation is consistent with each rival theory. By modeling this probability with covariates, one can also explore the condition under which a particular theory applies. We discuss a principles way to identify a list of observations that are statistically consistent with each theory and propose measure of the overall performance of each competing theory. We illustrate the relatives’ advantages of our method over existing methods through empirical and stimulation studies.

References

Achen, C. H.( 2005.) “Let’s Put Garbage-Can Regressions and Garbage-Can Probits Where They

a. Belong.”Conflict Man¬agement and Peace Science (p): 327–339.

Beck, N., and J. N. Katz. (2007). “Random Coefficient Models for Time-Series-Cross-Section

a. Data:Monte Carlo Experi-ments.” Political Analysis 15(p): 182–195.

Benjamini, Y., and Y. Hochberg. (1995). “Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful

Approach to Mul¬tiple Testing.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 57(p): 289–300

Braumoeller,B.(2003.) “Causal Complexity and the Study of Politics.” Political Analysis 11(p): 209–333.

Clarke, K. A.(2000.) “Testing Non-nested Models of Interna¬tional Relations: Reevaluating

a. Realism.”American Journal of Political Science 45(3): 724–44.

Davidson, R., and J. G. MacKinnon .(1981). “Several Tests for Model Specification in the Presence of

a. Alternative Hypothe-ses.” Econometrica 49(3): 781–93.

Dempster, A. P., N. M. Laird, and D. B. Rubin.( 2017) “Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data via

a. the EM Algorithm (with Discussion).” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, Methodological p. 1–37.

Friedman, M. (1966.) “The Methodology of Positive Eco-nomics.“ In Essays in Positive Economics.

a. Chicago: University of Chicago Press,P. 3–160.

Fru¨hwirth-Schnatter, S.( 2007). Finite Mixture and Markov Switching Models. New York: Springer.

.

Harrison, G. W., and E. E. Rutstro¨m. (2009.) “Expected Utility Theory and Prospect Theory: One

Wedding and a Decent Funeral.” Experimental Economics (P): 133–158

Downloads

Published

2023-05-26

How to Cite

BONIFACE CHUKWUMA, O. ., & Patience Amaoge, E. (2023). STATISTICAL METHOD FOR EMPIRICAL TESTING OF COMPETING THEORY IN ANAMBRA STATE POLYTECHNIC, MGBAKWU. Journal of Advance Research in Computer Science & Engineering (ISSN 2456-3552), 9(5), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.53555/nncse.v9i5.1696