Imaging Technologies in Breast Cancer Screening Beyond Mammography
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53555/nncse.v2i5.407Keywords:
Breast Cancer, Mammography, X-ray Mammography, Contrast Enhanced Mammography, Digital Mammography, Ultrasound, Automated Whole Breast Ultrasound (AWBU), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Abstract
Still there is a passionate debate in medical world about the best screening method for Breast Cancer. Early detection is an effective way to diagnose and manage breast cancer. Mammography is the most widely used screening modality, with solid evidence of benefit for women aged 40 to 74 years. Even then it has also undergone increased scrutiny for False-Positives with additional testing which increase radiation dose, cost and anxiety. False-Negatives with false sense of security and potential delay in cancer diagnosis. To overcome these challenges, new imaging technologies for breast cancer screening have been developed, including; X- ray Mammography, Contrast Enhanced Mammography, Digital Mammography, Ultrasound, Automated Whole Breast Ultrasound (AWBU), and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) are being evaluated. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of different medical imaging techniques used in the diagnosis of breast cancer. We compare their effectiveness, advantages, and disadvantages for detecting early-stage breast cancer. We mainly focusing on the comparison of these technologies with mammography for the diagnosis of breast cancer. Here we recommend early detection of Breast Cancer. Even though the optimal screening will ultimately require a personalized approach. It based on the metrics of cancer risk with selective application of specific screening technologies best suited to the individual’s age, risk, and breast density.
References
Breast Cancer Screening-National Cancer Institute http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/screening/breast/healthprofessional.
U.S. Breast Cancer Statistics - www.breastcancer.org/symptoms/understand_bc/statistics
Awareness: October Is Breast Cancer Awareness Month - www.cancerresearch.purdue.edu/resources/awareness/breast-cancer-awareness-month.
http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@epidemiology surveilance/documents/document/acspc-030975.pdf.
GLOBOCAN 2012: Estimated Cancer Incidents, Mortality and Prevalence World Wide 2012 – International Agency for Research on
Cancer: WHO
Jennifer S. Drukteinis, M.D., Blaise P. Mooney, M.D., Chris I. Flowers, MBBS, and Robert A Gatenby, M.D. -Beyond Mammography:
New Frontiers in Breast Cancer Screening, Am J Med. Jun 2013; 126(6): 472–479.
K. H. Ng and M. Muttarak, “Advances in mammography have improved early detection of breast cancer,” J. Hong Kong College Radiol., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 126–131, 2003.
C. Lewis, “FDA sets higher standards for mammography,” FDA Consum., vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 13–17, 1999.
S. Carkaci, L. Santiago, B. E. Adrada, and G. J. Whitman, "Screening for breast cancer with sonography," In Seminars in Roentgenology, Vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 285, 2011.
N. F. Boyd, H. Guo, L. J. Martin, L. Sun, J. Stone, E. Fishell, R. A. Jong et al," Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer," New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 356, no. 3, pp. 227-236, 2007.
Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus fi lm mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1773-1783.
E. D. Pisano, C. Gatsonis, E. Hendrick, M. Yaffe, J. Baum, S. Acharyya,E. Conant, L. Fajardo, L. Bassett, C. D’Orsi, R. Jong, and M.
Rebner,“Diagnostic performance of digital versus filmmammography for breastcancerscreening,” New England J. Med., vol. 353, no. 17,
pp. 1773–1783, 2005.
D. Spurgeon, “Digital mammography is more accurate only for certaingroups of women, Br. Med. J, vol. 331, no.7518, pp. 653–653,2005.
M. Del, P. Mantellini, S. Ciatto, R. Bonardi, F. Martinelli, B. Lazzari, and N. Houssami, “Full-field digital versus screen-film
mammography:Comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts,” Amer. J. Roentgenol., vol. 189, no. 4, pp. 860–866, 2007.
NCI Cancer Fact Sheets. (2007). [Online]. Available: http://www.cancer.gov/ cancertopics/factsheet/Detection/screening-mammograms.
T.Wang and N. Karayiannis, “Detection of microcalcifications in digitalmammograms using wavelets,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., vol. 17, no. 4,pp. 498–509, Aug. 1998.
R. Bird, T. Wallace, and B. Yankaskas, “Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography,” Radiology, vol. 184, no. 3, pp. 613–
, 1992.
K. Kerlikowske, P. Carney, B. Geller, M. Mandelson, S. Taplin, K. Malvin, V. Ernster, N. Urban, G. Cutter, R. Rosenberg, and R. Ballard-Barbash, “Performance of screening mammography among women with and without a first-degree relative with breast cancer,” Ann.
Internal Med., vol. 133, no. 11, pp. 855–863, 2000.
J. Brown, S. Bryan, and R. Warren, “Mammography screening: An incremental cost effectiveness analysis of double versus single reading of mammograms,” Br. Med. J., vol. 312, no. 7034, pp. 809–812, 1996.
R. Warren and S. Duffy, “Comparison of single and double reading of mammograms, and change in effectiveness with experience,” Br. J. Radiol., vol. 68, no. 813, pp. 958–962, 1995.
Dromain C, Balleyguier C, Adler G, Garbay JR, Delaloge S. Contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Eur J Radiol. 2009;69:34–42.
[PubMed]
Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography (Chapter 2)- . Digital Mammography Medical Radiology 2010, pp 187-198
Diekmann F, Freyer M, Diekmann S, Fallenberg EM, Fischer T, Bick U, Pöllinger A. Evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital
mammography. Eur J Radiol. 2009:Epub ahead of print.
D. L. Monticciolo, "Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast for Cancer Diagnosis and Staging." Vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 319-330, 2011.
L. S. J. Sim, J. H. C. L. Hendriks, P. Bult, and S. M. C. F. Chong, "US correlation for MRI-detected breast lesions in women with familial risk of breast cancer," Clinical Radiology, Vol. 60, no. 7, pp. 801-806, 2005.
E. A. Morris, "Screening for breast cancer with MRI." Seminars in Ultrasound, CT, and MRI, Vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 45-54, WB Saunders, 2003.
E. A. Morris, "Review of breast MRI: Indications and limitations," Seminars in Roentgenology, Vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 226-237, Elsevier, 2001.
Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Viehweg P, Heinig A, Küchler C. Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: accuracy, value, controversies, solutions. Eur J Radiol. 1997;24:94–108. [PubMed]
Liu PF, Debatin JF, Caduff RF, Kacl G, Garzoli E, Krestin GP. Improved diagnostic accuracy in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the breast by combined quantitative and qualitative analysis. Br J Radiol. 1998;71:501–509. [PubMed]
Schnall MD. Application of magnetic resonance imaging to early detection of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2001;3:17–21. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Lehman CD, Schnall MD. Imaging in breast cancer: Magnetic resonance imaging. Breast Cancer Res. 2005;7:215–219. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
http://www.breastcancer.org/symptoms/testing/types/mri/screening
33 K. M. Kelly, J. Dean, W. S. Comulada, and S.J. Lee, "Breast cancer detection using automated whole breast ultrasound and mammography in radiographically dense breasts," European Radiology, Vol. 20, no.3, pp. 734-742, 2010.
S. Carkaci, L. Santiago, B. E. Adrada, and G. J. Whitman, "Screening for breast cancer with sonography," Vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 285, 2011.
Emerging Technologies in Breast Cancer Detection By Andrew P. Smith, PhD, Patricia A. Hall, Donna M. Marcello, RT (R) (M)
W. Yang, and P. J. Dempsey, "Diagnostic breast ultrasound: current status and future directions," Radiologic Clinics of North America, Vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 845-861, 2005.
RadiologyInfo. Ultrasound of the Breast. www.radiologyinfo.org/
The Role of Imaging Techniques in Diagnosis of Breast Cancer - Current Health Sciences Journal Vol. 37, No. 2, 2011
Kevin M. Kelly,Judy Dean, W. Scott Comulada, Sung-Jae Lee - Breast cancer detection using automated whole breast ultrasound and mammography in radiographically dense breasts - Eur Radiol (2010) 20: 734–742 DOI 10.1007/s00330-009-1588-y
D’Orsi CJ, Bassett LW, Berg WA et al (2003) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data system, BI-RADS: mammography, 4th edn. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA
Mendelson EB, Baum JK, Berg WA, Merritt CRB, Rubin E (2003) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, BI-RADS: Ultrasound, 1st edn. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA
Berg WA, Zhang Z, Lehrer D, et al. Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk. JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association.2012;307(13):1394–404. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
A Survey of Medical Imaging Techniques Used for Breast Cancer Detection-Islam, M.S. ; Dept. of Electr. Eng., Univ. of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND, USA ; Kaabouch, N. ; Wen Chen Hu- IEEE Conference Publications.
Beyond Mammography: New Frontiers in Breast Cancer Screening -Jennifer S. Drukteinis, M.D., Blaise P. Mooney, M.D., Chris I. Flowers, MBBS, and Robert A Gatenby, M.D
Breast imaging: A survey- World J Clin Oncol. 2011 Apr 10; 2(4): 171–178. Published online 2011 Apr 10. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v2.i4.171 PMCID: PMC3100484
Emerging Technologies in Breast Cancer Detection- By Andrew P. Smith, PhD, Patricia A. Hall, Donna M. Marcello, RT (R) (M)
Recent Advances in Breast-Specific Imaging -Claudia G. Berman, MD
The Role of Imaging Techniques in Diagnosis of Breast Cancer - Current Health Sciences Journal Vol. 37, No. 2, 2011.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Terms & Condition
Submission -
Author can submit the manuscript through our online submission process or email us at the designated email id in contact details.
The other mode of submission not accepted than online and email.
Before submission please read the submission guidelines.
NN Publication accepts only article submitted in pdf/doc/docx/rtf file format. Another format except given file formats will no be considered .
Author will be responsible for the error mistakes in the submission files. The minor changes can be done without any cost after publication. But for major changes NN Publication may charges you the editing charges.
Publication (Online) -
The online publication is scheduled on last date of every month, but it can be delayed by 24 to 48 hours due to editorial process if huge number of articles comes to publish in single issue.
Automatic notificatation email will be sent to the all users on publication of an issue, so its author’s duty to check their email inbox or SPAM folder to get this notification.
After publication of article author can not withdraw their article.
If editor’s found any issue after publication of article then the NN Publication have the authority to remove the article from online website.
No refund will be provided after online publication of article.
Publication (Print) -
The print copy publication are sent as per the author’s request after 2 weeks of online publication of that issue.
NN Publication will ship the article by India Post and provide the consignment number on dispatch of print copy.
NN Publication follows all the guidelines of delivery provided by IndiaPost and hence not responsible for delay in delivery due to any kind of reasons.
Refund of hard copy will not be provided after dispatch or print of the journal.
NN Publication will be responsible for raise a complain if there is any issue occurs in delivery, but still will not be responsible for providing the refund.
NN Publication will be responsible to resend the print copy only and only if the print copy is lost or print copy is damaged in delivery / or there is delay more than 6 months.
According to India Post the delivery should be completed with in 1-3 weeks after dispatch of articles.
Privacy Policy-
NN Publicationl uses the email ids of authors and editors and readers for sending editorial or publication notification only, we do not reveal or sell the email ids to any other website or company.
