COMPARISON OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS BETWEEN LAPAROSCOPIC AND OPEN PANCREATODUODENECTOMY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53555/nnmhs.v9i8.1786Keywords:
: Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy, Open pancreatoduodenectomy, Panreatic cancerAbstract
Introduction: Despite using open and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy methods. However, clinicians worldwide are still unsure regarding laparoscopic adoption. This technique's challenging dissection and anastomosis may explain this. The oncological outcomes of open and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy are uncertain and maybe disputed. The procedure uses these methods.
The aim: This article compared safety and effectiveness between laparoscopic and open pancreatoduodenectomy.
Methods: By comparing itself to the standards set by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020, this study was able to show that it met all of the requirements. So, the experts were able to make sure that the study was as up-to-date as it was possible to be. For this search approach, publications that came out between 2013 and 2023 were taken into account. Several different online reference sources, like Pubmed and SagePub, were used to do this. It was decided not to take into account review pieces, works that had already been published, or works that were only half done.
Result: In the PubMed database, the results of our search brought up 176 articles, whereas the results of our search on SagePub brought up 82 articles. The results of the search conducted for the last year of 2013 yielded a total 43 articles for PubMed and 21 articles for SagePub. In the end, we compiled a total of 27 papers, 19 of which came from PubMed and eight of which came from SagePub. We included seven research that met the criteria.
Conclusion: Studies show that LPD is associated with good short-term outcomes, high survival rates, short length of stay, and less bleeding. The operating time for patients with LPD is longer than for patients with OPD.
References
. Mizrahi JD, Surana R, Valle JW, Shroff RT. Pancreatic cancer. Lancet. 2020;395(10242):2008–20.
. Vincent A, Herman J, Schulick R, Hruban RH, Goggins M. Pancreatic cancer. Lancet (London, England). 2011 Aug;378(9791):607–20.
. Jaffee EM, Hruban RH, Canto M, Kern SE. Focus on pancreas cancer. Cancer Cell. 2002;2(1):25–8.
. Jiang Y-L, Zhang R-C, Zhou Y-C. Comparison of overall survival and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy and open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 2019 Aug;19(1):781.
. Are C, Dhir M, Ravipati L. History of pancreaticoduodenectomy: early misconceptions, initial milestones and the pioneers. HPB Off J Int Hepato Pancreato Biliary Assoc. 2011 Jun;13(6):377–84.
. Hu J-X, Zhao C-F, Chen W-B, Liu Q-C, Li Q-W, Lin Y-Y, et al. Pancreatic cancer: A review of epidemiology, trend, and risk factors. World J Gastroenterol. 2021;27(27):4298.
. Ilic M, Ilic I. Epidemiology of pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Nov;22(44):9694–705.
. Ikenaga N, Ohtsuka T, Nakata K, Watanabe Y, Mori Y, Nakamura M. Clinical significance of postoperative acute pancreatitis after pancreatoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy. Surgery. 2021;169(4):732–7.
. Wang M, Li D, Chen R, Huang X, Li J, Liu Y, et al. Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;6(6):438–47.
. Jaschinski T, Mosch CG, Eikermann M, Neugebauer EAM, Sauerland S. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;(11).
. Chen X-M, Sun D-L, Zhang Y. Laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy combined with uncinated process approach: A comparative study evaluating perioperative outcomes (Retrospective cohort study). Int J Surg. 2018 Mar;51:170–3.
. Chapman BC, Gajdos C, Hosokawa P, Henderson W, Paniccia A, Overbey DM, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic to open pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Surg Endosc. 2018 May;32(5):2239–48.
. Stauffer JA, Coppola A, Villacreses D, Mody K, Johnson E, Li Z, et al. Laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: long-term results at a single institution. Surg Endosc. 2017 May;31(5):2233–41.
. Kantor O, Talamonti MS, Sharpe S, Lutfi W, Winchester DJ, Roggin KK, et al. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma provides short-term oncologic outcomes and long-term overall survival rates similar to those for open pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am J Surg. 2017 Mar;213(3):512–5.
. Dokmak S, Ftériche FS, Aussilhou B, Bensafta Y, Lévy P, Ruszniewski P, et al. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy should not be routine for resection of periampullary tumors. J Am Coll Surg. 2015 May;220(5):831–8.
. Croome KP, Farnell MB, Que FG, Reid-Lombardo KM, Truty MJ, Nagorney DM, et al. Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: oncologic advantages over open approaches? Ann Surg. 2014 Oct;260(4):633–40.
. Tempero MA, Malafa MP, Behrman SW, Benson AB 3rd, Casper ES, Chiorean EG, et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, version 2.2014: featured updates to the NCCN guidelines. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2014 Aug;12(8):1083–93.
. Merkow J, Paniccia A, Edil BH. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a descriptive and comparative review. Chin J Cancer Res. 2015 Aug;27(4):368–75.
. Gagner M, Pomp A. Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc. 1994 May;8(5):408–10.
. Asbun HJ, Stauffer JA. Laparoscopic vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy: overall outcomes and severity of complications using the Accordion Severity Grading System. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215(6):810–9.
. Wang H, Wang Y, Xing H, Zhou Y, Zhao J, Jiang J, et al. Laparoscopic surgery within an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol reduced postoperative ileus by increasing postoperative Treg levels in patients with right-side colon carcinoma. Med Sci Monit Int Med J Exp Clin Res. 2018;24:7231.
. Tang J, Liu X, Ma T, Lv X, Jiang W, Zhang J, et al. Application of enhanced recovery after surgery during the perioperative period in infants with Hirschsprung’s disease - A multi-center randomized clinical trial. Clin Nutr. 2020 Jul;39(7):2062–9.
. Gerber MH, Delitto D, Crippen CJ, George TJ, Behrns KE, Trevino JG, et al. Analysis of the cost effectiveness of laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;21:1404–10.
. Tran TB, Dua MM, Worhunsky DJ, Poultsides GA, Norton JA, Visser BC. The first decade of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy in the United States: costs and outcomes using the nationwide inpatient sample. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:1778–83.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Advance Research in Medical & Health Science (ISSN: 2208-2425)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Licensing
Ninety Nine Publication publishes articles under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This licensing allows for any use of the work, provided the original author(s) and source are credited, thereby facilitating the free exchange and use of research for the advancement of knowledge.
Detailed Licensing Terms
Attribution (BY): Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. Users may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses them or their use.
No Additional Restrictions: Users may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
