COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF METHODS OF INSULIN DELIVERY AND GLUCOSE MONITORING FOR DIABETES MELLITUS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Authors

  • Chrysman Andreria Hatulely Faculty of Medicine, Maranatha Christian University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53555/nnmhs.v9i8.1807

Keywords:

Diabetes mellitus, Insulin, Glucose, Monitoring

Abstract

Introduction: Achieving glycemic control remains difficult for patients with type 1 diabetes. We compared the efficacy of day-and-night hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery to sensor-augmented pump therapy in individuals 6 years and older with suboptimally controlled type 1 diabetes.

The aim: This article compared effectiveness and safety of methods of insulin delivery and glucose monitoring for diabetes mellitus.

Methods: By comparing itself to the standards set by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020, this study was able to show that it met all of the requirements. So, the experts were able to make sure that the study was as up-to-date as it was possible to be. For this search approach, publications that came out between 2013 and 2023 were taken into account. Several different online reference sources, like Pubmed and SagePub, were used to do this. It was decided not to take into account review pieces, works that had already been published, or works that were only half done.

Result: In the PubMed database, the results of our search brought up 166 articles, whereas the results of our search on SagePub brought up 143 articles. The results of the search conducted for the last year of 2013 yielded a total 116 articles for PubMed and 89 articles for SagePub. In the end, we compiled a total of 23 papers, 15 of which came from PubMed and eight of which came from SagePub. We included six research that met the criteria.

Conclusion: The use of a hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery system in free-living conditions for a period of twelve weeks led to clinically relevant improvements in glycaemic control while simultaneously reducing the risk of hypoglycemia in suboptimally controlled type 1 diabetes in adults, adolescents, and children aged six years and older.

References

. Jameson J, Fauci A, Kasper D, Hauser S, Longo D, Loscalzo J. Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine 20th ed. New York NY, McGraw Hill Educ. 2018;

. International Diabetes Federation. Diabetes. Brussels: IDF; 2017.

. Aathira R, Jain V. Advances in management of type 1 diabetes mellitus. World J Diabetes. 2014;15(5):689–96.

. Kliegman R. M; et al. Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunder; 2016.

. American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2016;62–9.

. Unger RH, Orci L. Paracrinology of islets and the paracrinopathy of diabetes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(37):16009–12.

. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Riset Kesehatan Dasar [Internet]. Jakarta; 2018. Available from: http://www.depkes.go.id/resources/download/infoterkini/materi_rakorpop_2018/Hasil Riskesdas 2018.pdf

. Soelistijo SA, Lindarto D, Decroli E, et al. Pedoman Pengelolaan dan Pencegahan Diabetes Melitus Tipe 2 Dewasa di Indonesia. Jakarta: PB Perkeni; 2021.

. Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, Matthews DR, Neil HAW. 10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(15):1577–89.

. Association AD. Standards of medical care in diabetes—2011. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(Supplement_1):S11–61.

. Association AD. 6. Glycemic Targets: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2018. Diabetes Care [Internet]. 2017 Nov 24;41(Supplement_1):S55–64. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2337/dc18-S006

. Monami M, Lamanna C, Marchionni N, Mannucci E. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily insulin injections in type 1 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Acta Diabetol. 2010;47:77–81.

. Thabit H, Tauschmann M, Allen JM, Leelarathna L, Hartnell S, Wilinska ME, et al. Home Use of an Artificial Beta Cell in Type 1 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov;373(22):2129–40.

. Tauschmann M, Thabit H, Bally L, Allen JM, Hartnell S, Wilinska ME, et al. Closed-loop insulin delivery in suboptimally controlled type 1 diabetes: a multicentre, 12-week randomised trial. Lancet (London, England). 2018 Oct;392(10155):1321–9.

. Garg SK, Weinzimer SA, Tamborlane W V, Buckingham BA, Bode BW, Bailey TS, et al. Glucose Outcomes with the In-Home Use of a Hybrid Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery System in Adolescents and Adults with Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017 Mar;19(3):155–63.

. Bergenstal RM, Garg S, Weinzimer SA, Buckingham BA, Bode BW, Tamborlane W V, et al. Safety of a Hybrid Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery System in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes. JAMA. 2016 Oct;316(13):1407–8.

. Taleb N, Emami A, Suppere C, Messier V, Legault L, Ladouceur M, et al. Efficacy of single-hormone and dual-hormone artificial pancreas during continuous and interval exercise in adult patients with type 1 diabetes: randomised controlled crossover trial. Diabetologia. 2016 Dec;59(12):2561–71.

. Castle JR, El Youssef J, Wilson LM, Reddy R, Resalat N, Branigan D, et al. Randomized Outpatient Trial of Single- and Dual-Hormone Closed-Loop Systems That Adapt to Exercise Using Wearable Sensors. Diabetes Care. 2018 Jul;41(7):1471–7.

. Kropff J, Del Favero S, Place J, Toffanin C, Visentin R, Monaro M, et al. 2 month evening and night closed-loop glucose control in patients with type 1 diabetes under free-living conditions: a randomised crossover trial. lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015 Dec;3(12):939–47.

. Yaribeygi H, Farrokhi FR, Butler AE, Sahebkar A. Insulin resistance: Review of the underlying molecular mechanisms. J Cell Physiol. 2019 Jun;234(6):8152–61.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-11

How to Cite

Andreria Hatulely, C. . (2023). COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF METHODS OF INSULIN DELIVERY AND GLUCOSE MONITORING FOR DIABETES MELLITUS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW. Journal of Advanced Research in Medical and Health Science (ISSN 2208-2425), 9(8), 125-130. https://doi.org/10.53555/nnmhs.v9i8.1807