SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF USE OF PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME IN INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY

Authors

  • Bella Sugih Laksono Nurhayati General Hospital, Garut, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/d71bg957

Keywords:

Interventional radiology, Patient reported outcome, Quality of Life

Abstract

Introduction: At present, the implementation of patient-reported outcomes in interventional radiology is not widespread. However, they are capable of significantly impacting the manner in which we deliver healthcare. Patient-reported outcomes provide an avenue for evaluating the perceived advantages that patients encounter subsequent to a medical procedure. Furthermore, they facilitate a comparison of these results with those of open procedures that are more invasive, as perceived by the patient.

The aim: This study review of use of patient reported outcome in interventional radiology.

Methods: For this systematic review, publications that were published from 2012 to 2023 were taken into account during the search process. This was achieved through the utilization of numerous online reference sources, such as Pubmed and SagePub. The decision was made to exclude review articles, previously published works, and incomplete works.

Result: We obtained 94 articles from Pubmed and 110 from SagePub. The therapies we extracted were 1 article from Pubmed and 3 articles from SagePub.

Conclusion: Quality of life and patient perception must be respected as one of the parameters of successful therapy. Previous research shows that PRO can be used with good validity and reliability as a therapeutic outcome parameter in many cases, including interventional radiology.

References

Arnold MJ, Keung JJ, McCarragher B. Interventional radiology indications and best practices. Am Fam Physician.

Vogl TJ, Reith W, Rummeny EJ. Diagnostic and interventional radiology. Springer

Brock KK, Chen SR, Sheth RA, Siewerdsen JH. Imaging in Interventional Radiology 2043 and Beyond. Radiology.

Weiss CR, Hafezi-Nejad N. Interventional Radiology Past, Present, and Future. Vol. 308, Radiology. Radiological Society of North America

Irvine I, Hayden R, Greene L, Ryan AG. An Update on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Interventional Radiology The Future Measure of Our Success. Vol. 46, Cardiovascular and interventional radiology. United States; 2023. hal. 1657–61.

Weldring T, Smith SMS. Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). Heal Serv insights.

Black N. Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare. Bmj.

Weldring T, Smith SMS. Article commentary patient-reported outcomes (pros) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Heal Serv insights.

Ring NY, England RW, Motaghi M, Garg T, Gong AJ, Gullotti DM, et al. Responsiveness of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Vascular Malformation Questionnaire in Patients with Low-Flow Vascular Malformations. J Vasc Interv Radiol

England RW, Motaghi M, Kohler B, Hemmingson TE, Wu AW, Weiss CR. Development and Preliminary Validation of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Vascular Malformation Questionnaire: A Prospective Cohort Study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. Mei

Horbach SER, Van De Ven JS, Nieuwkerk PT, Spuls PI, Van Der Horst C, Reekers JA. Patient-reported outcomes of bleomycin sclerotherapy for low-flow vascular malformations and predictors of improvement. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-15

How to Cite

Sugih Laksono, B. . (2023). SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF USE OF PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME IN INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY. Journal of Advanced Research in Medical and Health Science (ISSN 2208-2425), 9(12), 99-106. https://doi.org/10.61841/d71bg957