CANCER REHABILITATION AND THE FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES : A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Authors

  • Rosyid Prasetyo Faculty of Medicine, Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Yoga Nuswantoro Faculty of Medicine, Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Efa Anggraini Faculty of Medicine, Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/fr17sh08

Keywords:

Cancer rehabilitation, Outcomes

Abstract

Background: Cancer rehabilitation is a subspecialty of rehabilitation medicine concerned with restoring and maintaining the highest possible level of function, independence, and quality of life to patients at all stages of their cancer diagnosis, including those undergoing potentially curative therapy, those receiving palliative care, and cancer survivors.

Methods: By comparing itself to the standards set by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020, this study was able to show that it met all of the requirements. So, the experts were able to make sure that the study was as up-to-date as it was possible to be. For this search approach, publications that came out between 2014 and 2024 were taken into account. Several different online reference sources, like Pubmed and SCIENCE DIRECT, were used to do this. It was decided not to take into account review pieces, works that had already been published, or works that were only half done.

Result: In the PubMed database, the results of our search brought up 961 articles, whereas the results of our search on SCIENCE DIRECT brought up 211 articles. The results of the search conducted for the last year of 2014 yielded a total 45 articles for PubMed and 34 articles for SCIENCE DIRECT. In the end, we compiled a total of  6 papers, 5 of which came from PubMed and 1 of which came from SCIENCE DIRECT. We included six research that met the criteria.

Conclusion: In summary, these findings give evidence that rehabilitative therapies are effective for people who have had cancer. The findings should be considered in light of the fact that several studies exhibited a moderate risk of bias and/or limitations in research quality. These findings may serve as a platform for future research aimed at developing clinical practice guidelines for rehabilitative therapies across cancer types.

References

Stubblefield MD. Cancer Rehabilitation. Semin Oncol. 2014;38(3):386–93.

Dennett AM, Elkins MR. Cancer rehabilitation. Vol. 66, Journal of Physiotherapy. Australian Physiotherapy Association; 2020. p. 70–2.

Hayes SC, Rye S, Disipio T, Yates P, Bashford J. Exercise for health: a randomized, controlled trial evaluating the impact of a pragmatic, translational exercise intervention on the quality of life, function and treatment-related side effects following breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;175–86.

Chandwani KD, Perkins G, Nagendra HR, Raghuram N V., Spelman A, Nagarathna R, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of yoga in women with breast cancer undergoing radiotherapy. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2014 Apr 1;32(10):1058–65.

Zhou Y, Cartmel B, Gottlieb L, Ercolano EA, Li F, Harrigan M, et al. Randomized Trial of Exercise on Quality of Life in Women With Ovarian Cancer: Women’s Activity and Lifestyle Study in Connecticut (WALC). J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017 Dec 1;109(12).

Brown JC, Damjanov N, Courneya KS, Troxel AB, Zemel BS, Rickels MR, et al. A randomized dose-response trial of aerobic exercise and health-related quality of life in colon cancer survivors. Psychooncology. 2018 Apr 1;27(4):1221–8.

El-Jawahri A, Le Blanc T, Van Dusen H, Traeger L, Greer JA, Pirl WF, et al. Effect of inpatient palliative care on quality of life 2weeks after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association. 2016 Nov 22;316(20):2094–103.

Cnossen IC, van Uden-Kraan CF, Witte BI, Aalders YJ, de Goede CJT, de Bree R, et al. Prophylactic exercises among head and neck cancer patients during and after swallowing sparing intensity modulated radiation: adherence and exercise performance levels of a 12-week guided home-based program. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2017 Feb 1;274(2):1129–38.

Raz DJ, Sun V, Kim JY, Williams AC, Koczywas M, Cristea M, et al. Long-Term Effect of an Interdisciplinary Supportive Care Intervention for Lung Cancer Survivors After Surgical Procedures. In: Annals of Thoracic Surgery. Elsevier USA; 2016. p. 495–503.

Lehmann J, Rothmund M, Riedl D, Rumpold G, Grote V, Fischer MJ, et al. Clinical outcome assessment in cancer rehabilitation and the central role of patient-reported outcomes. Vol. 14, Cancers. MDPI; 2022.

Salakari MRJ, Surakka T, Nurminen R, Pylkkänen L. Effects of rehabilitation among patients with advances cancer: A systematic review. Vol. 54, Acta Oncologica. Informa Healthcare; 2015. p. 618–28.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-20

How to Cite

Prasetyo, R. ., Nuswantoro, Y. N., & Anggraini, E. . (2024). CANCER REHABILITATION AND THE FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES : A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW. Journal of Advanced Research in Medical and Health Science (ISSN 2208-2425), 10(1), 140-147. https://doi.org/10.61841/fr17sh08