THE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OPEN SURGERY VS MINIMALLY INVASIVE IN HIGH RISK ENDOMETRIAL CANCER
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/frv9q458Keywords:
Open surgery, minimally invasive, endometrial cancerAbstract
Background: When treated with minimally invasive surgery (MIS), women with early-stage endometrial cancer recover more quickly from surgery than when they have open operations; nevertheless, there is no discernible difference in terms of overall survival or progression-free survival.
Aims : This systematic review is to review the comparison of open surgery and minimally invasive in high risk endometrial cancer
Methods: By comparing itself to the standards set by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020, this study was able to show that it met all of the requirements. So, the experts were able to make sure that the study was as up-to-date as it was possible to be. For this search approach, publications that came out between 2014 and 2024 were taken into account. Several different online reference sources, like Pubmed and SCIENCE DIRECT, were used to do this. It was decided not to take into account review pieces, works that had already been published, or works that were only half done.
Result: In the PubMed database, the results of our search brought up 144 articles, whereas the results of our search on SCIENCE DIRECT brought up 588 articles. The results of the search conducted for the last year of 2014 yielded a total 121 articles for PubMed and 175 articles for SCIENCE DIRECT. In the end, we compiled a total of 5 papers, 4 of which came from PubMed and 1 of which came from SCIENCE DIRECT. We included five research that met the criteria.
Conclusion: In summary, this systematic review of observational studies showed that the prognosis of endometrial cancer patients with high risk histology was unaffected by minimally invasive surgery and might confirm the findings of this rare but lethal malignancy.
References
Felix AS, Bower JK, Pfeiffer RM, Raman S V., Cohn DE, Sherman ME. High cardiovascular disease mortality after endometrial cancer diagnosis: Results from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database. Int J Cancer. 2017 Feb 1;140(3):555–64.
Lindfors A, Akesson A, Staf C, Sjoli P, Sundfeldt K, Dahm-Kahler P. Robotic vs Open Surgery for Endometrial Cancer in Elderly Patients: Surgical Outcome, Survival, and Cost Analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018 May;28(4):692–9.
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):7–30.
Cantrell LA, Blank SV, Duska LR. Uterine carcinosarcoma: A review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;137(3):581–8.
Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Pareja R, Lopez A, Vieira M, Ribeiro R, et al. Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(20):1895–904.
Odetto D, Valzacchi GMR, Ostojich M, Alessandria S, Darin MC. Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy in women with high risk endometrial cancer: A multi-center study performed in Argentina. Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2023;46.
Janda M, Gebski V, Davies LC, Forder P, Brand A, Hogg R, et al. Effect of total laparoscopic hysterectomy vs total abdominal hysterectomy on disease-free survival among women with stage i endometrial cancer: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association. 2017 Mar 28;317(12):1224–33.
Fader AN, Seamon LG, Escobar PF, Frasure HE, Havrilesky LA, Zanotti KM, et al. Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy in women with high grade endometrial cancer: A multi-site study performed at high volume cancer centers. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Aug;126(2):180–5.
Segarra-Vidal B, Dinoi G, Zorrilla-Vaca A, Mariani A, Student V, Garcia NA, et al. Minimally Invasive Compared With Open Hysterectomy in High-Risk Endometrial Cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;138(6):828–36.
Borgfeldt C, Holmberg E, Marcickiewicz J, Stålberg K, Tholander B, Lundqvist EÅ, et al. Survival in endometrial cancer in relation to minimally invasive surgery or open surgery – a Swedish Gynecologic Cancer Group (SweGCG) study. BMC Cancer. 2021 Dec 1;21(1).
Bergstrom J, Aloisi A, Armbruster S, Yen TT, Casarin J, Leitao MM, et al. Minimally invasive hysterectomy surgery rates for endometrial cancer performed at National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Centers. Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Mar 1;148(3):480–4.
Chiva L, Zanagnolo V, Querleu D, Martin-Calvo N, Arevalo-Serrano J, Capilna ME. SUCCOR study: an international European cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020;30(9):1269–77.
Fader AN, Java J, Tenney M, Ricci S, Gunderson CC, Temkin SM, et al. Impact of histology and surgical approach on survival among women with early-stage, high-grade uterine cancer: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group ancillary analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2016;143(3):460–5.
Zhang Q, Silver M, Chen YJ, Wolf J, Hayek J, Alagkiozidis I. Comparison of Minimally Invasive Surgery with Open Surgery for Type II Endometrial Cancer: An Analysis of the National Cancer Database. Healthcare (Switzerland). 2023 Dec 1;11(24).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Advanced Research in Medical and Health Science (ISSN 2208-2425)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Licensing
Ninety Nine Publication publishes articles under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This licensing allows for any use of the work, provided the original author(s) and source are credited, thereby facilitating the free exchange and use of research for the advancement of knowledge.
Detailed Licensing Terms
Attribution (BY): Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. Users may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses them or their use.
No Additional Restrictions: Users may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
