UTERINE RUPTURE DURING PREGNANCY: A COMPREHENSIVE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/bc9fmr86Keywords:
Pregnancy, sectio caesaria, uterus rupture, vaginal birth after caesareanAbstract
Introduction: Uterine rupture, a rare but serious obstetric condition involving a tear through the uterine wall, has varying incidences globally, with scarred uteri, morbidly attached placenta, grand multiparity, and oxytocin use being common risk factors. This systematic review aims to comprehensively analyze the literature on uterine rupture during pregnancy, focusing on risk factors, geographical incidence variations, etiological patterns, impact of medical interventions, and maternal outcomes, with a goal to enhance understanding, identify preventive strategies, and improve clinical management.
Method: The researchers in this study followed the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines to ensure that their work met the required standards. This was done to ensure the precision and reliability of the conclusions derived from the research.
Result: Our search produced 11 results. After looking at the titles and summaries, we found 9 papers that fit our criteria. At first, we excluded several articles because they were written in review style and case reports. But after reading the full papers carefully, we included five papers in our final analysis. These papers included a retrospective observational study, prospective study, and retrospective study.
Conclusion: In conclusion, uterine rupture (UR) is a catastrophic event requiring heightened vigilance in pregnant women with high-risk factors to mitigate severe consequences for both obstetricians and patients. Trials of labor after cesarean (TOLAC), a safe delivery option, faces challenges in Shanghai and China, and the risk of uterine rupture emphasizes the need for evaluating dosages and duration of prostaglandins and oxytocin. Our series highlights the grave neonatal prognosis of uterine rupture, stressing the importance of timely management and recognizing fetal heart rate abnormalities. The URIDA investigation, the largest database on UR during pregnancy, reveals insights into the association between previous uterine surgery, leiomyoma, and UR, emphasizing the need for early diagnosis and immediate treatment to minimize complications and ensure favorable outcomes in both the index and subsequent pregnancies.
References
Sinha M, Gupta R, Gupta P, Rani R, Kaur R, Singh R. Uterine rupture: a seven year review at a tertiary care hospital in New Delhi, India. Indian J Community Med. 2016;41:45–49. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Veena P, Habeebullah S, Chaturvedula L. A review of 93 cases of ruptured uterus over a period of 2 years in a tertiary care hospital in South India. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;32:260–263. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22369400/ [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Chang YH. Uterine rupture over 11 years: a retrospective descriptive study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020;60:709–713. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Vandenberghe G, Bloemenkamp K, Berlage S, et al. The International Network of Obstetric Survey Systems study of uterine rupture: a descriptive multi-country population-based study. BJOG. 2019;126:370–381. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Paprikar S, Lagoo A, Lagoo J. Uterine rupture: review of cases from tertiary care centre in India. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2022;11 [Google Scholar]
Hawkins, L., Robertson, D., Frecker, H. et al. Spontaneous uterine rupture and surgical repair at 21 weeks gestation with progression to live birth: a case report. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 18, 132 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1761-x
Wan, Sheng & Yang, Mengnan & Pei, Jindan & Zhao, Xiaobo & Zhou, Chenchen & Wu, Yuelin & Sun, Qianqian & Wu, Guizhu & Hua, Xiaolin. (2022). Pregnancy outcomes and associated factors for uterine rupture: an 8 years population-based retrospective study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 22. 10.1186/s12884-022-04415-6.
Guiliano, M., Closset, E., Therby, D., LeGoueff, F., Deruelle, P., & Subtil, D. (2014). Signs, symptoms and complications of complete and partial uterine ruptures during pregnancy and delivery. European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology, 179, 130–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.05.004
Shu-Han You, Yao-Lung Chang, Chih-Feng Yen, Rupture of the scarred and unscarred gravid uterus: Outcomes and risk factors analysis, Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Volume 57, Issue 2, 2018, Pages 248-254, ISSN 1028-4559, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2018.02.014. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1028455918300329)
Vernekar M, Rajib R. Unscarred uterine rupture: a retrospective analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2016;66(Suppl 1):51–4.
Khanam RA, Khatun M. Ruptured uterus: an ongoing tragedy of motherhood. Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull. 2001;27(2):43–7.
Vilchez G, Hoyos LR, Maldonado MC, Lagos M, Kruger M, Bahado-Singh R. Risk of neonatal mortality according to gestational age after elective repeat cesarean delivery. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016;294(1):77–81.
Astatikie G, Limenih MA, Kebede M. Maternal and fetal outcomes of uterine rupture and factors associated with maternal death secondary to uterine rupture. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):117.
Mu Y, Li X, Zhu J, Liu Z, Li M, Deng K, et al. Prior caesarean section and likelihood of vaginal birth, 2012-2016, China. Bull World Health Organ. 2018;96(8):548–57
Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK. Births in the United States, 2018. NCHS Data Brief. 2019;346:1–8. 34. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 205: vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(2):e110–27.
Osada H. Uterine adenomyosis and adenomyoma: the surgical approach. Fertil Steril. 2018;109(3):406–17.
Gil Y, Badeghiesh A, Suarthana E, Mansour F, Capmas P, Volodarsky-Perel A, et al. Risk of uterine rupture after myomectomy by laparoscopy or laparotomy. J Gynecol Obstetrics Hum Reprod. 2020;49(8):101843
Milazzo GN, Catalano A, Badia V, Mallozzi M, Caserta D. Myoma and myomectomy: poor evidence concern in pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2017;43(12):1789–804
Abrar S, Abrar T, Sayyed E, Naqvi SA. Ruptured uterus: Frequency, risk factors and feto-maternal outcome: Current scenario in a low-resource setup. PLoS One. 2022 Apr 8;17(4):e0266062. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266062. PMID: 35395033; PMCID: PMC8993016
Deng MF, Zhang XD, Zhang QF, Liu J. Uterine rupture in patients with a history of multiple curettages: Two case reports. World J Clin Cases. 2020 Dec 26;8(24):6322-6329. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i24.6322. PMID: 33392313; PMCID: PMC7760430.
Togioka BM, Tonismae T. Uterine Rupture. [Updated 2023 Jul 29]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK559209/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Roy Christian, Frenki Pieter Hetharia, Franky Bangkit Sumardi, Inggit Dwi Rahayu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licensing
Ninety Nine Publication publishes articles under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This licensing allows for any use of the work, provided the original author(s) and source are credited, thereby facilitating the free exchange and use of research for the advancement of knowledge.
Detailed Licensing Terms
Attribution (BY): Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. Users may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses them or their use.
No Additional Restrictions: Users may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
