THE STUDY OF COMPARISON OF SINGLE-INCISION LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS CONVENTIONAL LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY: A COMPREHENSIVE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/wrfaxr48Keywords:
Appendicitis, appendectomy, laparoscopy, treatmentAbstract
Background: Acute appendicitis is highly prevalent in children with an acute abdomen, and appendectomy is still the main method of treatment for this disease. The standard treatments for acute appendicitis are early open surgery and laparoscopic surgery.
The aim: The aim of this study to show about comparison of single incision laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy.
Methods: By the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020, this study was able to show that it met all of the requirements. This search approach, publications that came out between 2014 and 2024 were taken into account. Several different online reference sources, like Pubmed, SagePub, and Sciencedirect were used to do this. It was decided not to take into account review pieces, works that had already been published, or works that were only half done.
Result: Eight publications were found to be directly related to our ongoing systematic examination after a rigorous three-level screening approach. Subsequently, a comprehensive analysis of the complete text was conducted, and additional scrutiny was given to these articles.
Conclusion: HLA has a negative impact on quality of life and aesthetics because it requires three surgical incisions. On the contrary, in single-incision transumbilical laparoscopic appendicectomy (SILA), the incision is made around the umbilicus.
References
Cirocchi R, Cianci MC, Amato L, Properzi L, Buononato M, Di Rienzo VM, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy with single port vs conventional access: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Surg Endosc [Internet]. 2024;38(4):1667–84. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10659-w
Di Saverio S, Podda M, De Simone B, Ceresoli M, Augustin G, Gori A, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines. World J Emerg Surg. 2020;15(1):1–42.
Nascimento R, Sousa RC, Mesquita F, Castro B, Oliveira De Almeida R, De G, et al. SINGLE-INCISION VIDEOLAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY WITH CONVENTIONAL VIDEOLAPAROSCOPY EQUIPMENT Videoapendicectomia por incisão única com material de videolaparoscopia convencional. ABCD Arq Bras Cir Dig Artig Orig. 2014;27(1):34–7.
IL KANG S, WOO T, BAE SU, YANG CS. Single-Incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial (SCAR trial). Int J Surg Protoc. 2021;25(1):201–8.
Chung HS, Jung SM, Lee M ri, Shin YC, Jun HM, Kim J Il, et al. Single-Incision, Two-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy as an Alternative to Transumbilical Single-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy. J Minim Invasive Surg. 2019;22(1):11–7.
Kim WJ, Jin HY, Lee H, Bae JH, Koh W, Mun JY, et al. Comparing the postoperative outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy and three port appendectomy with enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for acute appendicitis: A propensity score matching analysis. Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37(4):232–8.
Feng J, Cui N, Wang Z, Duan J. Bayesian network meta-analysis of the effects of single-incision laparoscopic surgery, conventional laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy for the treatment of acute appendicitis. Exp Ther Med. 2017;14(6):5908–16.
Li FH, Zeng DX, Chen L, Xu CF, Tan L, Zhang P, et al. Comparison of clinical efficacy of single-incision and traditional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity-score matched studies. Front Oncol. 2022;12(October):1–12.
Suh SG, Sohn HJ, Kim BG, Park JM, Choi YS, Park YK, et al. Single-Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy by Surgical Trainees. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech. 2016;26(6):470–2.
Antoniou SA, Koch OO, Antoniou GA, Lasithiotakis K, Chalkiadakis GE, Pointner R, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized trials on single-incision laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy. Am J Surg [Internet]. 2014;207(4):613–22. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.07.045
Kim YH, Lee WS. The learning curve of single-port laparoscopic appendectomy performed by emergent operation. World J Emerg Surg [Internet]. 2016;11(1):1–6. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-016-0096-z
Basukala S, Thapa N, Bhusal U, Shrestha O, Karki S, Regmi SK, et al. Comparison of outcomes of open and laparoscopic appendectomy: A retrospective cohort study. Heal Sci Reports. 2023;6(8):1–6.
Liu J, Chen G, Mao X, Jiang Z, Jiang N, Xia N, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy versus traditional three-hole laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis in children by senior pediatric surgeons: a multicenter study from China. Front Pediatr. 2023;11(July):1–10.
Zhang N, Li Y, Zhou R. Comparison of Single-Person Laparoscopic Appendectomy Using a Novel Brace-Assisted Camera Holding System and Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Neural Network Algorithm Analysis. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2022;2022.
Wu S, Shen Y, Wang J, Wei J, Chen X. Conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy versus transumbilical and suprapubic single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy using only conventional laparoscopic instruments. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg [Internet]. 2022;407(8):3623–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-022-02683-6
Muneef A, Kumbhar U, Vijayakumar C, Shaikh O. A Comparative Study Between Single-Incision Laparoscopic Appendicectomy Using Conventional Instruments and Glove-Port (SILACIG) and Conventional Multiport Laparoscopic Appendicectomy (CMLA). Cureus. 2020;12(10):1–10.
Kim JH, Kim HY, Park SK, Lee JS, Heo DS, Park SW, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy:Experiences from 1208 cases of single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg. 2015;262(6):1054–8.
Liang HH, Hung CS, Wang W, Tam KW, Chang CC, Liu HH, et al. Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy in 688 patients: A retrospective comparative analysis. Can J Surg. 2014;57(3):89–97.
Joliat GR, Uldry E, Demartines N, Schäfer M. Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: A case-match study. SAGE Open Med. 2014;2:1–6.
Chen Y, Fan Z, Zhang X, Fu X, Li J, Yuan J, et al. A brief overview of single-port laparoscopic appendectomy as an optimal surgical procedure for patients with acute appendicitis: still a long way to go. J Int Med Res. 2023;51(7):2–6.
Krzyzak M, Mulrooney SM. Acute Appendicitis Review: Background, Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Cureus. 2020;12(6):6–13.
Joo J Il, Park JH, Kim DH, Lim SW. Feasibility and Safety of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy by a Surgical Resident under Supervision of a Staff Surgeon. J Minim Invasive Surg. 2019;22(2):55–60.
Kang BH, Yoon KC, Jung SW, Lee GR, Lee HS. Feasibility of single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy in a small hospital. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2016;91(2):74–9.
Huang KJ, Lin KT, Wu CJ, Li YX, Chang WC, Sheu BC. Single incision laparoscopic surgery using conventional laparoscopic instruments versus two-port laparoscopic surgery for adnexal lesions. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2021;11(1):1–6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82204-5
Teng TZJ, Thong XR, Lau KY, Balasubramaniam S, Shelat VG. Acute appendicitis–advances and controversies. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2021;13(11):1293–314.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Fredy satrio Nugroho, Rudolf Rudy Budiantoro, Wahyu Nur Alamsyah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licensing
Ninety Nine Publication publishes articles under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This licensing allows for any use of the work, provided the original author(s) and source are credited, thereby facilitating the free exchange and use of research for the advancement of knowledge.
Detailed Licensing Terms
Attribution (BY): Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. Users may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses them or their use.
No Additional Restrictions: Users may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
