LAPARASCOPIC VERSUS OPEN MESH REPAIR FOR RECURRENT INGUINAL HERNIA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/7d4qq784Keywords:
Laparascopic, open mesh, inguinal herniaAbstract
Background: Inguinal hernia is one of the most common conditions seen in clinic, and is often treated through the general surgery department. Laparoscopic repair and open repair with mesh are the typical treatments for inguinal hernia, and both regimens have proved beneficial in treating inguinal hernia. However, recurrence, with a rate as high as 33, poses a significant problem to the effective treatment of inguinal hernia.
The aim: This study aims to show about laparascopic versus open mesh repair for recurrent inguinal hernia.
Methods: By comparing itself to the standards set by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020, this study was able to show that it met all of the requirements. So, the experts were able to make sure that the study was as up-to-date as it was possible to be. For this search approach, publications that came out between 2013 and 2023 were taken into account. Several different online reference sources, like Pubmed and SagePub, were used to do this. It was decided not to take into account review pieces, works that had already been published, or works that were only half done.
Result: In the PubMed database, the results of our search brought up 10 articles, whereas the results of our search on SagePub brought up 60 articles. The results of the search conducted for the last year of 2013 yielded a total 2 articles for PubMed and 14 articles for SagePub. The result from title screening, a total 1 articles for PubMed and 10 articles for SagePub. In the end, we compiled a total of 7 papers. We included five research that met the criteria.
Conclusion: The laparoscopic approach is superior to the open mesh approach for the repair of recurrent inguinal hernia in some aspects, including the incision infection rate and length of hospital stay. However, more high-quality studies on the effects of laparoscopic and open mesh repair for the treatment of recurrent inguinal hernia are warranted.
References
Haladu N, Alabi A, Brazzelli M, Imamura M, Ahmed I, Ramsay G, et al. Open versus laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia: an overview of systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials. Surg Endosc
Gudigopuram SVR, Raguthu CC, Gajjela H, Kela I, Kakarala CL, Hassan M, et al. Inguinal Hernia Mesh Repair: The Factors to Consider When Deciding Between Open Versus Laparoscopic Repair. Cureus. 2021;1–10.
Burton V, Perez AJ. Comparison of open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Mini-invasive Surg. 2021;5.
Elmessiry MM, Gebaly AA. Laparoscopic versus open mesh repair of bilateral primary inguinal hernia: A three-armed Randomized controlled trial. Ann Med Surg
P. B. S, B. S. S, V. P. K, S. PS. Laparoscopic versus open mesh repair of unilateral inguinal hernia: a comparative study. Int Surg J. 2017;4(3):921.
Eker HH, Hansson BME, Buunen M, Janssen IMC, Pierik REGJM, Hop WC, et al. Laparoscopic vs Open Incisional Hernia Repair. JAMA Surg [Internet]. 2013 Mar 1;148(3):259.
Xu Z, Zhao Y, Fu X, Hu W, Zhao C, Ge C, et al. Laparoscopic versus Open Inguinal Hernia Repair in Aging Patients: A Propensity Score Matching Based Retrospective Study. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2023;19(August):657–66.
Yang C, Deng S. Laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for the treatment of recurrent inguinal hernia: A systematic review and meta analysis. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2020;9(3):1164–73.
Mahmood B, Christoffersen M, Miserez M, Bisgaard T. Laparoscopic or open paediatric inguinal hernia repair a systematic review. Dan Med J. 2020;67(7):1–11.
Kim B, Duh QY. Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair. Surg Pitfalls Prev Manag. 2008;515–21.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Kevin Gabriel, Siemon Junior Berhimpon
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licensing
Ninety Nine Publication publishes articles under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This licensing allows for any use of the work, provided the original author(s) and source are credited, thereby facilitating the free exchange and use of research for the advancement of knowledge.
Detailed Licensing Terms
Attribution (BY): Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. Users may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses them or their use.
No Additional Restrictions: Users may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
