Reverse Domain Hijacking
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53555/nnssh.v5i4.726Keywords:
domain names, hijacking, Reverse hijacking, RDNH, ACPAAbstract
Prologue
There is often a conflict between domain names owners and trademarks holders’ rights, and If a party has a specific domain name but the other party owns trademark rights with that name, it's likely that there's a problem, one of these problems presented by domain names hijacking. From a legal perspective, domain names hijacking taking important place in cyberspace challenges, in this scenario, domain names rights are infringed when a third party managed to transfer a domain name to his account without illegal right to be able to resell it and gain money
Assumption
The point of this research arises from that UDPR policy is not enough to solve the reverse domain hijacking phenomena, and then comprehensive legislation is needed to solve this phenomenon.
Methodology
The methodology will depend on inductive approach based on Selected and analyses court decisions with legal texts. This paper will try to provides scholarly appraisal of the legal and policy related to domain names hijacking.
References
Orin Hargraves, New Words, Oxford University Press, 2004, P 70
- Jerry Pournelle, Erin McKean, 1001 Computer Words You Need to Know, Oxford University Press, 2004, p36.
- Angus Stevenson, Maurice Waite, Concise Oxford English Dictionary: Luxury Edition Publisher OUP Oxford, 2011, p356.
- Susie Dent, The Language Report Publisher Oxford University Press, 2003, Page 31.
- Richard Lindsay, Ad Law: The Essential Guide to Advertising Law and Regulation, Kogan Page Publishers, 2016, P46,
- Berkeley Technology Law, Journal University of California Press, 2005,2005 Volume 20, Issue 1 - Page 185.
James Van Roekel, MaryAnn Bell, Bobby Ezell, Cybersins and Digital Good Deeds: A Book About Technology and Ethics, CRC Press, 2006, p51.
What’s in a Name: Reverse Domain Name Hijacking and Cybersquatting, https://hutchersonlaw.com/reverse-domain-name-hijacking-cybersquatting
Nam H Nguyen, 2018 Essential Cyber Security Handbook in English, Publisher am H Nguyen, 2018
Jacqueline D. Lipton, Internet Domain Names, Trademarks and Free Speech, Publisher Edward Elgar Publishing, 2010, p12
Munindar P. Singh, The Practical Handbook of Internet Computing Publisher CRC Press, 2004, p 1302
Lee A. Bygrave, Jon Bing, Internet Governance: Infrastructure and Institutions, Publisher OUP Oxford, 2009, p82.
Ibid, p 96
Journal of Legal Studies in Business - Volume 6, Publisher West Publishing Company, 1999, Page 110.
David Lindsay, International Domain Name Law: ICANN and the UDRP, Publisher Bloomsbury Publishing, 2007 p96
BNA's Banking Report - Volume 74 ,2000, Page 896.
- Emily Hurtt, What’s in a Name? The Rights to Domain Names Under Various Principles, University of Cincinnati Law Review December 1, 2017 p840
Emily Hurtt, What’s in a Name? The Rights to Domain Names Under Various Principles, University of Cincinnati Law Review December 1, 2017 p840
What’s in a Name: Reverse Domain Name Hijacking and Cybersquatting, https://hutchersonlaw.com/reverse-domain-name-hijacking-cybersquatting/
Bashir Ahmad Mallal, The Malayan Law Journal, Volume 2, Publisher Malaya Publishing House Limited, 2000 Page xix,
Seymour Bosworth, M. E. Kabay, Computer Security Handbook. Publisher John Wiley & Sons, 2002 Page 10.
Congressional Record, V. 145, Pt. 14, August 4, 1999 to August 5, 1999, p 20012.
the United States federal law known as Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA), 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d), is a U.S. law enacted in 1999 that established a cause of action for registering, trafficking in, or using a domain name confusingly similar to, or dilutive of, a trademark or personal name.
the UDRP Policy Rules Paragraph 15 (e)
Adam V. Floyd, O'Connor's Federal Intellectual Property Codes Plus, Jones McClure Pub., 2007, p 60
American Bar Association. Section of Public Utility, Communications, and Transportation Law, Annual Report, Publisher American Bar Association Section of Public Utility, Communications and Transportation Law, 2003, p201
Ibid
- United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, E-Commerce and Development Report 2002, p44.
Raymond S. R. Ku, Cyberspace Law: Cases and Materials, Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, 2016, p290-291
- David Lindsay, International Domain Name Law: ICANN and the UDR, Bloomsbury Publishing, 2007, p161.
- Peter Luther & Alan Moran, Technology in America, Macmillan International Higher Education, 2018, p533.
- Vakul Sharma, Information Technology Law and Practice, Universal Law Publishing, 2011, p 531.
- Margaret Jane Radin, John A. Rothchild, Gregory M. Silverman, Intellectual Property and the Internet: Cases and Materials, Foundation Press, 2004, p180.
- Margaret Jane Radin, John Rothchild, Gregory M. Silverman, Internet Commerce: The Emerging Legal Framework: Cases and Materials, Publisher Foundation Press, 2002, p257.
- J. Thomas McCarthy, Roger E. Schechter, David J. Franklyn, McCarthy's Desk Encyclopedia of Intellectual Property, the University of Michigan, Publisher Bureau of National Affairs, 2004, p523.
- Harold C. Wegner, Edward G. Poplawski, Understanding the new patent law: how the changes affect your patent practice and portfolio, Publisher Practicing Law Institute, 2000, p100.
- J. Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition Edition 4, Publisher, Clark Boardman Callaghan, 1996, Volumes 1-7.
- Anthony Connerty, A Manual of International Dispute Resolution, Publisher Commonwealth Secretariat, 2006, p320.
- The John Marshall Journal of Computer & Information Law, Volume 22, Publisher John Marshall Law School, 2003, p644.
- Steve Hedley, Tanya Frances Aplin, Blackstone's Statutes [on] IT & E-commerce, Edition 2, Oxford University Press, 2004, p333.
- American Jurisprudence Pleading and Practice Forms Annotated: State and Federal, Volume 1, Part 3, Lawyers Co-operative Publishing Company Publisher, West Group 2000, p472.
- Practicing Law Institute. Advanced Seminar on Trademark Law, Publisher Practicing Law Institute, 2002, p 900.
- Annual Internet Law Institute - Volume 2, publisher Practicing Law Institute, Page 230.
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal - Volume 15, Publisher University of California Press, 2000, Page 310
Harvard Law Review: Volume 129, Number 4 – February, Quid Pro Books, 2016
Christopher Enright, Federal Administrative Law, Federation Press, 2001, p393.
Harvard Law Review, Volume 129, Number 4 – February, Quid Pro Books, 2016, ibid
Christopher Enright, Federal Administrative Law, Federation Press, 2001, p393
Graham Earnshaw, China Economic Review's China Business Guide 2005, Publisher SinoMedia (Holdings) Co. Ltd., p577.
Michael D. Scott, Scott on Multimedia Law, Aspen Publishers Online, 2008, p 5-48
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, E-Commerce and Development Report 2002, p43.
- Jenny Ng, The Domain Name Registration System: Liberalization, Consumer Protection, and Growth, Publisher Routledge, 2013, p43
Ibid, p43
- Richard Raysman, Emerging Technologies and the Law: Forms and Analysis, Volume 1, Publisher Law Journal Press, 2002, p6-48
-- Jenny Ng, The Domain Name Registration System: Liberalization, Consumer Protection, and Growth, Publisher Routledge, 2013, ibid, p43
Ibid p43
Eun-Joo Min, WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center, Mathias Lilleengen, Collection of WIPO Domain Name Panel Decisions, Publisher Kluwer Law International B.V., 2004 P15.
- Hector MacQueen, Charlotte Waelde, Graeme Laurie, Contemporary Intellectual Property: Law and Policy, Publisher OUP Oxford, 2010, p723.
-Richard Raysman, Emerging Technologies and the Law: Forms and Analysis, Volume 1, Publisher Law Journal Press, 2002, p6-48
David Lindsay, International Domain Name Law: ICANN and the UDRP, Bloomsbury Publishing, 2007, p 367
DIGITI limited liability company v. Privacy Administrator, Anonymize, Inc / Michele Dinoia, Macrosten LTD Case No. D2018-2148, November 15, 2018
Delta & Matsuura, Law of the Internet, 4th Edition - Volume 1, Publisher Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, 2016, P 12-38
Ibid, p12-38
Delta & Matsuura, Law of the Internet, 4th Edition, Volume 1, Publisher, Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, ibid 2016 Page 12-38
Delta & Matsuura, Law of the Internet,4th Edition, Volume 1, Publisher, Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, 2016, ibid, p 12-38
Delta & Matsuura, Law of the Internet, 4th Edition, Volume 1, Publisher, Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, 2016, ibid, p
-34
section 15(e) of the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy.
Case Number: D2018-2148, https://www.wipo.int/amc/es/domains/search/text.jsp?case=D2018-2148
Ville de Paris v. Jeff Walter, Case No. D2009-1278, WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center, administrative panel decision, November 19, 2009, https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2009/d2009-1278.html
Computer Buyer's Guide and Handbook, University of Minnesota, Volume 20 publisher Computer Information Pub., 200 Publisher Computer Information Pub., 2001 1, University of Minnesota, Page 96
Ibid, p96.
Emily Hurtt, What’s in a Name? The Rights to Domain Names Under Various Principles, University of Cincinnati Law Review December 1, 2017 p843
Computer Law Reporter - Volume 38, Publisher Computer Law Reporter Incorporated, 2003, Page 824
Adam V. Floyd, O'Connor's Federal Intellectual Property Codes Plus, Jones McClure Pub., 2007, p 60
the ACPA is an extension of the Lanham Act which was passed by Congress in 1946, and codified the existing common law of trademarks.
Lee A. Bygrave, Jon Bing, Internet Governance: Infrastructure and Institutions, Publisher OUP Oxford, 2009, p82
Richard A. Spinello, A Defense of Intellectual Property Right Edward Elgar Publishing, 2009, p11,
Preventive Law Reporter, Volume 18 ,1999 Page 62.
Gerald B. Halt, Jr., John C. Donch, J., Amber R. Stiles, Intellectual Property in Consumer Electronics, Software and
Technology Startups, Publisher Springer Science & Business Media, 2013, p61.
- John G. Sprankling, The International Law of Property, Publisher OUP Oxford, 2014, p90.
- Konstantinos Komaitis, The Current State of Domain Name Regulation: Domain Names as Second-Class Citizens in a Mark-Dominated World, Publisher Routledge, 1st edition, 2010, p58.
- Journal of intellectual property law - Volume 11, the University of California,2003, Page 128.
Kentucky Law Journal - Volume 99, Issues 1-2, Publisher University of Kentucky, College of Law, 2010 Page 192.
- Konstantinos Komaitis, The Current State of Domain Name Regulation: Domain Names as Second-Class Citizens in a Mark-Dominated World, Publisher Routledge, 1st edition, 2010, ibid, p92.
Emily Hurtt, What’s in a Name? The Rights to Domain Names Under Various Principles, University of Cincinnati Law Review December 1, 2017 p840.
Emily Hurtt, What’s in a Name? The Rights to Domain Names Under Various Principles, University of Cincinnati Law Review December 1, 2017 p841
The Hastings Law Journal - Volume 56, Issues 1-3, Hastings College of Law, 2005, Page 41
Zheng Qin, Introduction to E-commerce, Springer Science & Business Media, 2010, P 186
Berkeley Technology Law Journal - Volume 15, Publisher University of California Press, 2000, Page 310
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, E-Commerce and Development Report 2002, p43
Zhou lin, China Court Cases on Intellectual Property Rights, Publisher, Kluwer Law International B.V., 2011, p 323.
EC-Council, Computer Forensics: Investigating Network Intrusions and Cyber Crime, Publisher Cengage Learning, 2009, p 9-4.
- United States Code, 2006, V. 8, Title 15, Commerce and Trade, Sections 80a-1 to End, p596.
- Congressional Record, V. 145, Pt. 21, November 17, 1999 to December 3, 1999, Publisher Government Printing Office, p30501.
- Rachel Gader-Shafran, MA, jd, llm, the trademark law dictionary, Publisher iUniverse, 2013, p218.
- Carol Chadirjian, The Business of Trademarks: A Practical Guide to Trademark Management for Attorneys and Paralegals, Publisher Universal-Publishers, 2018, p134.
- Thomas Hoeren, Jochen Stauder, International Sources of Electronic Commerce Regulation, Publisher Lit, 2001, p281.
- United States Code Service - Volume 15 Publisher LexisNexis, Page 5
Lanham act at 15 U.S.C. § 1117(d)
Roman L. Weil, Peter B. Frank, Michael J. Wagner, Litigation Services Handbook: The Role of the Financial Expert, Publisher John Wiley & Sons, 2002, p21-10.
- Jeffery Handelman, Guide to TTAB Practice, Publisher Aspen Publishers Online, 2007, p A-44.
- Mark A. Glick, Lara A. Reymann, Richard Hoffman, Intellectual Property Damages: Guidelines and Analysis, Publisher John Wiley & Sons, 2002, p457.
- Balotti, Jesse A. Finkelstein, The Delaware Law of Corporations & Business Organizations Statutory Deskbook, Asben Publisher 3
rd edition 2011, p80`.
Reverse Domain Name Hijacking Information, on https://www.rdnh.com/rdnh-provision-udrp/
Travis Crabtree, City of Paris ordered to pay for reverse domain name hijacking in groundbreaking decision, on web cite
ADR Report - Volume 4, Publisher Pike & Fischer, 2001Page 34
James Van Roekel, MaryAnn Bell, Bobby Ezell, Cybersins and Digital Good Deeds: A Book About Technology and Ethics, CRC Press, 2006, p51.
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
